NAPS 2019 Presentations

/NAPS 2019 Presentations
NAPS 2019 Presentations 2019-08-19T14:41:40-05:00

                                

Energetic Testing and Technology Developments                                                      

2019 NAPS-1.1  Advances in perforating testing; then next generation test systemAtwood, Schlumberger     

2019 NAPS-1.2  Improving Pumping Down Efficiency and Safety with Intelligent Assisting System –  Zhao, China National Petroleum Corporation

2019 NAPS-1.3  Testing the fines migration hypothesis for cased-hole gravel pack impairment using a novel laboratory approach – McGregor, Halliburton 

Perforating Dynamics and Modeling                                              

2019 NAPS-2.1  3D flatpack simulations –  Craddock, Halliburton 

2019 NAPS-2.2  Application of a Transient Near-Wellbore / Reservoir Simulator For Complex Completions Design Gilliat, Baker Hughes, a GE Company

2019 NAPS-2.3  Dynamic Overbalance vs. Dynamic Underbalance – API 19B Section IV testing of encapsulated shaped charges compared  to conventional hollow steel carrier guns – Fricke, DynaEnergetics

Energetic Testing and Technology Developments                                                      

2019 NAPS-3.1  Frac Charges – How Do They Really Perform Downhole? –Grove, Halliburton          

2019 NAPS-3.2  Cluster Perforating Systems – Tailored perforating for modern completions –  Sokolove, Hunting Titan 

Perforating and Energetic Safety                                     

2019 NAPS-4.1  2019 Revision of the PSAC/ESC Oilwell Perforators Safety Course – Wierenga, Energy Safety Canada/Downton’s Completions   

2019 NAPS-4.2  Agitating Explosives In Extended Reach Wells – A Good Idea?             Daly, Expro   

2019 NAPS-4.3  Increasing Safety by Advancing Perforating Technology        Amin, Hunting Titan

2019 NAPS-4.4  What Happens if Shear Ram Closed Against Perforating Guns  – Ibrahim, Petroleum Development of Oman                                                              

Productivity Improvement Case Studies                                     

2019 NAPS-5.1  A Look at Perforating for Mechanical Isolation Refracs –  Coker, Owen Oil Tools  

2019 NAPS-5.2  Extended Lateral Solutions for an Extremely Difficult Well Trajectory Albert, Allied-Horizontal Wireline Services 

2019 NAPS-5.3  Pressure Pulse PerforatingLoving, Owen Oil Tools   

Perforating Dynamics and Modeling                                              

2019 NAPS-6.1  Numerical simulation for near borehole fluid dynamics at perforation tunnel – Vega, University of Utah              

2019 NAPS-6.2  Dynamic behavior and simulation of a shock data measured low-debris transient-management gun system – Kuldeep Singh, Halliburton          

2019 NAPS-6.3  Prediction of Gun String Dynamic Failure Risks during Perforating – Rodgers, Starboard Innovations, LLC           

2019 NAPS-6.4  Re-perforating formerly inaccessible well areas beneath completion collapse and axially displaced tubularsMaouche, Archer   

Productivity Improvement Case Studies                                     

2019 NAPS-7.1  Perforating Deployment System Reduces Rig Time               Hillier, Schlumberger     

2019 NAPS-7.2  Perforating Trends, Technology and Evaluation in North America – Squires, ProTechnics, A Division of Core Laboratories         

Productivity Improvement Case Studies                                     

2019 NAPS-8.1  Propellant-Assisted Technologies Successfully Deployed in Middle-East Formations to Enhance Productivity – Gilliat, Baker Hughes, a GE Company  

2019 NAPS-8.2  Test Results (Field & Lab) for A New Composite Perforating Method that Integrates Propellant and Shaped Charges –Albert, Allied-Horizontal Wireline Services                

2019 NAPS-8.3  Instrumented Docking Perforating Gun System – Field experience results in Ecuador – Benavides, Schlumberger